5 Aug 1997
Haar v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [1997] NZACC 157
- Court
- District Court
Leave to appeal was granted because the interpretation of 'in‑patient services' (whether it requires at least an overnight stay) is a question of law of sufficient importance to merit High Court determination, and because the applicant has raised a substantive additional ground that regulation 5 may be ultra vires or unreasonable in light of s26A.