4 Mar 2020
TAYLOR v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS [2020] NZHC 383
- Citation
- [2020] NZHC 383
- Court
- High Court
The High Court held the redacted staff names, positions and contact details were not the appellant's personal information under the Privacy Act 1993 because they were administrative/staff information not "about" the appellant and their omission did not render the disclosed material unintelligible; accordingly the material was not disclosable under Principle 6 and the court did not need to, and did not, assess s29 withholding grounds; the appeal was dismissed and no interference with privacy under s66 was found.