3 May 2012
HILL V BLUEGUM HC TAU CIV-2008-470-455
- Citation
- openlaw-10ff5914_64a3_4e8f_a216_cc5a818afce6.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Court exercised its discretion to make no order for costs because the executor acted reasonably in pursuing an apparent asset, the defendant and his predecessor delayed asserting their rights for decades, and there was insufficient basis to fix blame on the deceased's estate that would justify shifting costs.