16 Mar 2006
FILMER & LUYT V JAMIESON CASTLES (A FIRM) CA CA35/05
- Citation
- openlaw-21a4acae_c124_41eb_b8e2_21d571bdcf28.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The appeal is dismissed because the Registrar gave the appellants a reasonable opportunity to be heard, the appellants expressly declined further submissions thereby waiving further cross‑examination, and there is no direct evidence that counsel assisting improperly made the decision for the Registrar; assistance by counsel under s148(3) is permissible provided the Registrar retains ultimate decision‑making authority.