30 May 2011
PARLANE AND SCHNAUER V PARLANE AS ESTATE BENEFICIARY HC AK CIV 2009-404-7607
- Citation
- openlaw-c37270ea_5c3e_4c1a_a112_de7c48685448.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The s66 application was refused because the questions central to the requested directions (in particular whether payments were loans or gifts and the proper treatment/vesting of the Orange Finance investment) involve substantial disputed facts that cannot be resolved on a s66 directions application; accordingly the Court is limited to ratifying or refusing proposed trustee decisions and must decline to make substantive factual determinations in this proceeding; costs reserved.