29 Jun 2009
BRADBURY V VANCE CA CA719/2008
- Citation
- openlaw-ac6c2ed9_c284_4a46_a4fe_53c5f932cd6e.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The evidence did not support the appellant's contention that the payments originated from her son or another entity; the payments were company funds made at the behest of a person in control without consideration or company liability, so s 298(2)(b) applied and the liquidator was entitled to summary judgment to recover the payments.