30 Jun 2016
JUSTO v BRIGGS [2016] NZHC 1464
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 1464
- Court
- High Court
On the untested affidavit evidence and an independent financial report, the plaintiff failed to prove oppressive or unfairly prejudicial conduct by the defendant; the company's downturn was attributable to the plaintiff's ill‑health and unavailability and there was no reliable evidence of misappropriation or conduct justifying buy‑out or liquidation orders under s 174, so both s 174 applications were dismissed.