8 Nov 2022
TAIA v AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 5 AND SOUTHLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE [2022] NZHC 2911
- Citation
- [2022] NZHC 2911
- Court
- High Court
The appellant was not entitled to costs because he was the unsuccessful party whose appeal was struck out for failure to pay security, he had been struck off the roll and was therefore not a lawyer able to rely on the lawyer‑in‑person exception, he took no steps on appeal, and the respondents did not seek costs; accordingly costs are to lie where they fall.