10 Dec 2013
EDMUNDS v LAUDER AND ANOR [2013] NZHC 3286
- Citation
- [2013] NZHC 3286
- Court
- High Court
Indemnity or increased costs refused because only some Rule 14.6(4) factors arguably applied, there was at least some evidentiary basis for the adverse possession claim, discovery defaults were remedied without demonstrated substantial extra expense, and the plaintiffs' conduct did not objectively justify costs above scale; accordingly 2B costs awarded and caveat removed.