18 Feb 2000
Tait v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [2000] NZACC 27
- Court
- District Court
The Court found the respondent complied with the s50 Procedure, the appellant had completed vocational rehabilitation to the extent reasonably attainable (demonstrated by obtaining and maintaining full‑time work), the goal of restoring pre‑injury remuneration was unrealistic and outside reasonable and cost‑effective rehabilitation under s23, therefore the s51 work capacity assessment and resulting cessation decision were correct.