1 Dec 2009
WHAREPAPA V FULTON HOGAN LTD HC AK CIV 2009-404-4539
- Citation
- openlaw-27512633_2f48_498a_a648_700067e3ff72.pdf
- Court
- High Court
On the evidence the parties orally agreed in October 2006 to vary the hourly rate to $30; the variation was supported by consideration because the plaintiff obtained increased work and priority, and the plaintiff's conduct (invoicing at $30 without timely protest and increased supply of operators) and credibility findings established a binding variation, so there was no breach by respondent.