28 Sept 2009
TWISS V CANNELL & ANOR HC CHCH CIV-2009-409-0584
- Citation
- openlaw-238738f3_4a06_4309_b7ac_0e2e16fbd465.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Adjournment refused because there was no certainty the defendants could obtain counsel due to lack of funds, substantial prejudice to the plaintiff from further delay (defendant in possession; plaintiff unpaid and meeting outgoings), and the court's duty to manage proceedings required the matter to proceed notwithstanding defendant's lack of representation.