13 Aug 2021
MCNAUGHTON v MCNAUGHTON [2021] NZHC 2109
- Citation
- [2021] NZHC 2109
- Court
- High Court
The court held that because the McNaughton v McNaughton proceeding is directly relevant to Mr Miller's security for costs application (specifically the claim of an equitable interest in 48a Pownall Street), Mr Miller is entitled to limited access to the pleadings to test solvency and oppose security for costs. Balancing open justice and privacy pre-hearing, access was confined to the statement of claim and any statement of defence/notice of opposition; access to the remainder of the court file was refused.