2 Aug 2005
Martin v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2005] NZACC 232
- Court
- District Court
The medical assessor provided adequate analysis specific to the two certified occupations and considered posture variation, keyboarding demands and the appellant's work history and trial; the appellant failed to show a material flaw in the assessment and proffered only a conflicting medical opinion, therefore the decision that the appellant had vocational independence as a proofreader and general/office clerk was correct.