18 Mar 2022
CRAIG v STRINGER [2022] NZHC 505
- Citation
- [2022] NZHC 505
- Court
- High Court
The court held that many passages of the defendant's brief were inadmissible because they constituted submissions, hearsay, irrelevant material or impermissible opinion; the judge sustained the plaintiff's objections in the categories marked, set out limited exceptions, and ordered the defendant to provide a replacement brief with the inadmissible passages struck; the defendant may not read the inadmissible passages at trial.