7 Dec 2016
LE GROS v R [2016] NZCA 586
- Citation
- [2016] NZCA 586
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The cumulative material in the warrant application — concordant witness descriptions, timing and vehicle evidence, photo montage selection, the defendant's vehicle ownership and occupation as a second‑hand dealer, and the match between items of interest and stolen property — provided reasonable grounds to believe stolen property would be at the defendant's residence, so the s6 warrant was lawfully issued and the appeal on that ground fails.