8 Dec 2020
PATEL v SHAH [2020] NZHC 3235
- Citation
- [2020] NZHC 3235
- Court
- High Court
On the facts and information before the court there was a serious question to be tried and the balance of convenience favoured interim relief because the plaintiffs faced significant, non-compensable prejudice to their living arrangements if the agreement were cancelled; damages were not an adequate remedy and equity favoured restraining the defendants from cancelling the management agreement and from re-entry pending further order.