14 Aug 2017
HOEBERECHTS v SPROTT AND NOWACKI [2017] NZHC 1928
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 1928
- Court
- High Court
On the interlocutory evidence the applicant failed to establish it was expedient to remove Adrian as executor; Adrian had taken prudent, beneficial steps in managing the principal asset and had provided detailed accounts and inventories; removal was unnecessary and would be premature on affidavit evidence alone; by consent Richard was discharged and replaced with an independent executor (Barry Stafford), and the remaining interlocutory relief was dismissed, with costs reserved.