14 Jul 2016
GILMORE v ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION [2016] NZHC 1594
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 1594
- Court
- High Court
No arguable question of law existed; ACC lawfully revoked cover under s65 because it obtained contemporaneous medical records and assessments that constituted new evidence exposing the original grant as clearly wrong, the District Court applied Bartels correctly in reaching a factual conclusion open on the evidence, and therefore special leave under s162 is refused.