7 May 2018
PHILLIP JOHN SMITH v ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2018] NZSC 40
- Citation
- [2018] NZSC 40
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal was refused because the legal question whether s14 extends to wearing a hairpiece was unlikely to be outcome‑determinative in this case, the matter was moot after permission to wear the hairpiece was restored, and resolution of related s23(5) issues would require factual findings inappropriate to decide on appeal.