14 May 2010
SHIRLEY-ANNE CARVER AND ORS V NEIL CLARENCE JACK AND ANOR CA268/2009
- Citation
- openlaw-c714f4e0_d049_4fb7_8968_b75c2be9454e.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The court refused the adjournment and declined the extension of time under r 43 because the applicants' explanation for delay was not compelling, the Official Assignee had refused consent to continuation due to lack of merit following the applicants' bankruptcy, and the underlying summary judgment gave the proposed appeal little prospect of success; accordingly the appeal was treated as abandoned under r 43 and respondents awarded costs.