12 Apr 2018
MUKOKO v R [2018] NZCA 87
- Citation
- [2018] NZCA 87
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Complainant's identification evidence was inadmissible and unreliable given contemporaneous equivocation (111 call, police notes, statement), poor viewing conditions and risk of misidentification of similar neighbours; even if admissible it should have been excluded under s8 because its minimal probative value was substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice. Those errors caused a miscarriage of justice, requiring quashing of convictions and ordering a retrial.