6 May 2019
MURRAY v NZ POLICE [2019] NZHC 966
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 966
- Court
- High Court
The conviction was upheld because reliable eyewitness testimony corroborated by photographs and damage allowed the inference that the appellant, while filtering, proceeded past stationary traffic without ensuring the road ahead was clear; that failure met the objective test for careless driving and there was no miscarriage of justice under s 232(2)(b).