23 Aug 2018
RHH LIMITED v ANDERSON (No.4) [2018] NZHC 2177
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 2177
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal under s 56(3) was refused because the interests of finality and efficient case management outweigh the plaintiffs' need for immediate interrogatory answers, there is no important question of law requiring appellate clarification, the plaintiffs can obtain sworn responses through statements of evidence and at the hearing, and appellate intervention would cause disproportionate disruption and is unlikely to succeed given the deferential review of procedural discretions.