2 Dec 2008
DAYU GUAN AND XIAOPENG WANG V BECKER & CO HC WN CIV 2008-485-1229
- Citation
- openlaw-d7fffccc_3355_4429_ac15_c10d824ead67.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Court upheld the Registrar's decision restoring the bill because there was insufficient evidence to displace the agreed fixed fee, the applicants' claimed contingency arrangement was implausible and rejected by prior decision-makers, and the Committee's reduction rested on an uncertain and apparently incorrect assessment of hours, so no justified basis existed to deem the fee excessive.