12 Dec 2006
ABERNETHY AND ANOR V THORNTON AND ANOR HC WN CIV-2005-485-2636
- Citation
- openlaw-6bd597e7_187c_4d8a_bfba_ea9fc45c0a43.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The adjournment was refused because the plaintiffs had accepted the 19 December fixture, the only reason advanced was the unavailability of a particular counsel, granting an adjournment would prejudice the respondent and delay proceedings, and the half‑day interlocutory hearing was not of such consequence that only the nominated counsel could appear.