25 Jun 2010
PAWSON V CLARIDGE AND ORS HC AK CIV-2009-404-4367
- Citation
- openlaw-96bca7b5_7e11_403f_8a1e_f7635f06b658.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Summary judgment was declined because defendants established an evidential foundation sufficient to raise a prima facie or arguable defence that the US judgment was obtained by fraud (notably inconsistent sworn representations by plaintiff on residency and Mr Claridge's involvement), creating a real question to be tried; jurisdiction/submission issues remained unresolved but were unnecessary to decide given the fraud defence.