22 Sept 2010
WILLIAMS V CAMERON AND ANOR HC NEL CIV-2010-442-222
- Citation
- openlaw-0e3dcee7_9ad8_41d3_bd9a_7adbc16587e9.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The strike‑out could not be sustained because it was not clear on the material before the Court that a binding settlement had been concluded; disputed oral evidence and unresolved factual matters (including whether a credit note was a term of settlement and whether acceptance was communicated) required full testing at trial, so the District Court's strike‑out was set aside.