16 May 2007
R & B PROPERTIES NO.1 LIMITED V NAPDA SUBDIVISION LTD HC AK CIV 2006-404-007192
- Citation
- openlaw-dd7f2299_ef8c_4898_9c20_2158ba2d3657.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Costs refused because the judge was not persuaded the purchaser breached the contract; the parties had a common intention to rely on an IRD setoff and that intention was frustrated by IRD delays, and the court exercised its discretionary power against awarding costs.