23 Mar 2012
TASMAN INSULATION NEW ZEALAND LIMITED V KNAUF INSULATION LIMITED HC AK CIV-2011-404-8141
- Citation
- openlaw-eb29f9bd_f61c_4edc_aa6d_ab302b729074.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The application for a separate question under r 10.15 was dismissed because the revocation issue under s 66(1)(c) is not sufficiently discrete: proving genericness requires inquiry into the owner's historical acts or inactivity since registration and a full factual context, so a separate question would not materially save time and could delay resolution; the matter must proceed to a full trial.