12 May 2006
BOYLE V ROWLAND-JONES AND ROWLAND-JONES HC WANG CIV-2006-483-008
- Citation
- openlaw-99d7d5d7_b7b7_4699_a717_98e61a061b29.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The applicant failed to establish a reasonably arguable case that an enforceable option existed: the communications show only an informal 'gentlemen's agreement', the Contracts Enforcement Act required a signed memorandum which was absent, and there was no evidence Mr Rowland-Jones had authority to bind the co-trustee; therefore the caveat could not be sustained and must lapse.