19 Mar 2010
GBR INVESTMENT LTD V S B (PAUL) KEUNG HC CHCH CIV-2009-409-001486
- Citation
- openlaw-7313d6fb_aea3_4942_863d_0a089daf4713.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Court found that apart from a possible limited reference to 'Vault Trust' (for which no retained evidence existed), Buddle Findlay's past instructions were discrete and did not produce confidential information relevant to the Koulanov claims; any 'getting to know you' information that might have existed was rendered public by the defendant's cross-examination in the November 2009 liquidation hearing, eliminating any real or appreciable risk of misuse; accordingly there was no basis to restrain or disqualify Buddle Findlay or Mr Forbes and the interlocutory application was dismissed.