8 Mar 2001
Facon v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2001] NZACC 48
- Court
- District Court
Appellant was put on notice of the overpayment before purchasing the vehicle and the purchase months later did not constitute an alteration of position in reliance on the validity of the payments such that repayment would be inequitable; therefore s.372(2)(b) does not require remission and the reviewer's refusal to remit is upheld.