10 May 2010
WILTSHIRE INVESTMENTS LIMITED V HALSTEAD HC AK CIV 2005-404-006473
- Citation
- openlaw-218c56a8_50f1_4b0c_9a1c_26c3c6bac2c4.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Court exercised its discretion to grant an examination order under r 17.12 because inquiries into past distributions, bank records and transactions could reveal recoverable trust property or causes of action (subrogated rights/exoneration) that constitute means of satisfying the judgment; the examination scope can include historical transactions where they may produce assets, subject to limiting inquiries futile to recovery (eg bankrupt recipients).