5 May 2021
S (CA199/2020) v THE DISTRICT COURT AT MANUKAU [2021] NZCA 163
- Citation
- [2021] NZCA 163
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Because the appellant failed to obtain the primary relief (stay/prohibition) the High Court correctly declined to grant a remedy and the finding that the discharge was unlawful did not equate to a Hansen indication or otherwise entitle the appellant to costs; judicial review was an inappropriate route to secure the requested stay and the High Court did not err in ordering costs to lie where they fell.