30 Apr 2009
BOYD V VAN HOUTEN HC CHCH CIV 2008-409-002478
- Citation
- openlaw-8d338ae0_16f8_4f47_9168_baf28470ce52.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was dismissed because, although s 21J(4)(d) permits inquiry into parties' mental states, the factual matrix here (respondent's documented assumptions in the draft agreement and the subsequent breakdown of the relationship) meant the point was not appropriate for further appellate consideration and existing guidance in Harrison is persuasive; accordingly the High Court declined to grant leave.