25 Feb 2022
MACNAMARA v MACNAMARA [application for leave to appeal] [2022] NZHC 287
- Citation
- [2022] NZHC 287
- Court
- High Court
The application was interlocutory and governed by Pt 7 of the High Court Rules, not Pts 9 and 18; the Judge did not err in refusing orders for cross-examination of the named deponents given the limited scope of the interlocutory application, the irrelevance or inadmissibility of some lines of inquiry, and the absence of an arguable error of law; granting leave would cause disproportionate delay and was not in the interests of justice, so leave to appeal was refused.