27 May 2016
Herron v Wallace [2016] NZHC 1127
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 1127
- Court
- High Court
The court found the 19 November 2015 direction granted leave to the defendants to file additional evidence in relation to the oppression defence so no fresh s98 application was required for the brief; contested statements were admissible where offered to demonstrate Wallace's perception, state of mind or motivation rather than to prove the truth of asserted out-of-court facts (thereby not constituting hearsay or inadmissible opinion), save for the final sentences of paragraph 37 which were excluded as impermissible opinion; exhibits produced during examination in chief (provisionally 12–27) w…