9 Dec 2005
LINES V WAKEFIELD BUILDINGS LIMITED HC NAP CIV-2005-441-825
- Citation
- openlaw-a42b1ccc_9a2b_4ef3_bf6f_b02fd76bf6a7.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Given the history and correspondence demonstrating a dispute and deadlock, the Court concluded it was not appropriate to grant the ex‑parte application and required the applicant to proceed on notice so the issues and competing interests could be properly considered.