18 Nov 2011
SEED ENHANCEMENTS LIMITED V AGRISOURCE 2000 LIMITED HC AK CIV 2010-404-004243
- Citation
- openlaw-dfbc9b34_3944_403b_9fd2_a58395bfb6f0.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Court held Stefes' General Conditions, including an exclusive jurisdiction clause designating German law and Hamburg courts, were incorporated and binding on Agrisource; Agrisource failed to establish sufficiently strong or exceptional circumstances to displace that clause and therefore New Zealand was not the appropriate forum; the application to strike out the protest was dismissed and Agrisource's claim against Stefes was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.