3 Jul 1998
Arthur v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [1998] NZACC 140
- Court
- District Court
The Corporation's cancellation of weekly compensation was unlawful because it lacked information to conclude entitlement had ended and could not validly rely on s73(2)(c) where no requirement or IRP had been put to the claimant and there was no established unreasonable refusal to agree to rehabilitation; accordingly the Corporation's and Review Officer's decisions are revoked and the appellant remains entitled to weekly compensation.