28 Jun 2019
DEEP v AUCKLAND GOLD LINE CO-OPERATIVE TAXI SOCIETY LTD [2019] NZHC 1494
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 1494
- Court
- High Court
Plaintiffs were entitled to costs because they succeeded on two causes of action, but most allegations of bias and improper purpose were rejected; one challenged decision implemented a shareholder resolution and the denial of access to the register was unlawful but not tainted by bias, therefore costs are awarded to the plaintiffs on a Category 2B basis reduced by 70% with disbursements to be fixed by the Registrar.