7 Oct 2005
L V R SC 49/2005
- Citation
- SC 49/2005
- Court
- Supreme Court
The Court granted leave to appeal on two grounds because those issues raised questions of legal principle and practice of general public importance — the correct analysis of the elements of attempted sexual violation and the correctness of the trial judge's jury directions and allocation of judge/jury roles — and refused leave on the evidentiary sufficiency ground because it lacked general importance and did not disclose a risk of substantial miscarriage of justice.