26 Nov 2010
CHURCHILL GROUP HOLDINGS LTD AND ORS V ARAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LTD AND ANOR CA CA80/2010
- Citation
- openlaw-47216536_dbd1_49bb_9d45_676d2c615482.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The appellants were ordered to pay costs on both the stay and recall applications to respondents, calculated as if each were a standard application for leave to appeal on a band A basis with usual disbursements and jointly and severally liable; the representation application was dismissed because r 5(1) did not provide the jurisdiction claimed and the Court's inherent powers were not engaged for a collateral attack and are limited to rare exceptional circumstances.