21 Mar 2012
BAYCITY TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED V UTTINGER HC AK CIV 2006-404-7709
- Citation
- openlaw-e54bf5eb_5b06_41a2_be0c_392f8bed99ae.pdf
- Court
- High Court
DairySense's counterclaim failed to plead with sufficient particularity the identity of the primary infringer, the specific instances of alleged primary infringement, and the precise acts by which BayCity procured or induced that infringement; absent those pleaded particulars the applications for further discovery, answers to interrogatories and inspection (including disassembly) were not justified and were declined, with software inspection deferred pending agreement on scope and confidentiality.