23 Jul 2009
KERMANI PROPERTIES LIMITED V PINK DOLL LIMITED HC AK CIV 2009-404-004113
- Citation
- openlaw-0f8a4627_0452_4a00_a25c_b494d6074569.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Although the defendant's case on the merits was weak and it had not complied with the statutory demand, the Court granted an interim restraint on advertising because the risk of irreparable harm to the defendant and the minimal prejudice to the plaintiff (given available advertising time) meant the balance of convenience favoured restraint until the stay application was heard; order to expire on 6 August 2009 unless extended.