24 Apr 2015
FISK v NAME SUPPRESSED [2015] NZHC 827
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 827
- Court
- High Court
Permanent name suppression was refused because the open justice principle and the strong presumption in favour of disclosure outweigh the respondent's claimed personal and business harms; the respondent did not establish the exceptional and objectively supportable level of prejudice needed to derogate from open justice, and interim suppression was insufficient to justify permanent suppression.