26 Apr 1999
Bron v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [1999] NZACC 102
- Court
- District Court
Because the appellant was deemed an employee under s44 and therefore the incapacity test in s37B applied, and the totality of medical evidence established he was capable of performing his former sedentary role or similar work for which he was suited by reason of experience, education, or training, he was not incapacitated and weekly compensation properly ceased (as of 5 June 1997).