31 Mar 2010
CARTER HOLT HARVEY V WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY HC AK CIV-2009-485-000244
- Citation
- openlaw-80c0997f_05e9_468b_a95d_d7605b465e1e.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Appeal allowed: the claimed invention lacked an inventive step under s 21(1)(e) because it was an aggregation of well-known integers (RFID tags, readers, databases) without any synergistic effect; therefore the Assistant Commissioner's decision granting the patent was set aside.