13 Dec 2013
DARREN GEORGE HOSKING v R [2013] NZSC 144
- Citation
- [2013] NZSC 144
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal was refused because the case did not raise any matter of general or public importance, the propensity evidence issue was governed by existing Supreme Court authority (Mahomed), there was no substantial risk of miscarriage of justice given the strength of the lead charge and the absence of any challenge to joinder, and therefore the interests of justice did not require granting leave.